Republican Texas Senator Ted Cruz has announced his candidacy for
President of the United States. While critics, including some in his
own party, dismiss him, Cruz is a smart, shrewd and brash politician.
He is also arrogant, self-confident and power-hungry. Cruz recently told Fox News host Sean Hannity that his critics call him "crazy." Well?
In September 2013, Senator Cruz spoke in opposition of the inclusion of
the Affordable Care Act in a continuing resolution to fund the
government. His faux-filibuster lasted more than 21 hours, and he
opened with, "I rise today in opposition to Obamacare." Then, after
being recognized, he said he would speak "until I am no longer able to
stand." His effort was not a filibuster because the Senate had already
scheduled its cloture vote. But the Cruz show went on, including
reading from the Dr. Seuss's classic, Green Eggs and Ham. His daughters watched from home on C-Span as he read from the book, “You do not like green eggs and ham?”
But Cruz was so angry with Republican supporters of the Senate vote he played the appeasement card in his rant
from the Senate floor. "If you go to the 1940s, Nazi Germany," Cruz
said. "Look, we saw in Britain, Neville Chamberlain, who told the
British people, 'Accept the Nazis. Yes, they'll dominate the continent
of Europe but that's not our problem. Let's appease them. Why? Because
it can't be done. We can't possibly stand against them.'"
Senator John McCain (R-AZ) was furious with Cruz's remarks. "I resoundingly reject that allegation," McCain said.
"That allegation, in my view, does a great disservice. A great
disservice to those brave Americans and those who stood up and said,
'what's happening in Europe cannot stand.'"
Mr. Cruz became one of the architects of the 2013 government shutdown that ran from October 1 to October 16. As many
as 800,000 government employees were furloughed and another 1.3 million
had to work without pay. It is estimated that the shutdown cost the
U.S. economy at least $12 billion. Representative Peter King (R-NY)
reacted brusquely to Cruz's presidential announcement. "Shutting down
the federal government and reading Dr. Seuss on the Senate floor are the
marks of a carnival barker not the leader of the free world," King said
in a statement.
Unapologetic, Cruz has continued his relentless attacks Obamacare. So it was ironic that Cruz made this announcement
Tuesday: "We'll be getting new health insurance and we'll presumably do
it through my job with the Senate, and so we'll be on the federal
exchange with millions of others on the federal exchange." Because
Cruz's wife was taking a leave of absence from her banking job at
Goldman Sachs the family will no longer be covered by their health plan.
But his spokesman said Senator Cruz wouldn't take the government
contribution he is entitled to as a member of Congress under the ACA.
Senator
Cruz, a Harvard educated lawyer and Princeton debate champion, is quick
to come up with a witty quip. For instance, when the White House
announced its support for net-neutrality. "In short, net neutrality is
Obamacare for the Internet," he said.
"It would put the government in charge of determining Internet
pricing, terms of service and what types of products and services can be
delivered, leading to fewer choices, fewer opportunities and higher
prices." But experts say his comparison is inaccurate. "It takes a
special kind of wrongness to look at a plan that is focused on making
sure that no one can be blocked and argue that it means the government
gets to pick what services can be delivered," the site TechDirt wrote.
In a 2010 speech, Cruz launched a McCarthy era attack on Harvard. The New Yorker reported
that he said, “There were fewer declared Republicans in the faculty
when we were there than Communists! There was one Republican. But there
were twelve who would say they were Marxists who believe in the
Communists overthrowing the United States government.” A Harvard
spokesperson was quoted as responding, "We are puzzled by the Senator's
assertions, as we are unaware of any basis for them."
Cruz can be
too clever by half. For instance, take his opposition to those who are
advocating measures to reduce global warming. "What do they do? They
scream, 'You're a denier.' They brand you a heretic," Cruz told Texas Tribune
reporter Jay Root. "Today, the global warming alarmists are the
equivalent of the flat-Earthers. It used to be [that] it is accepted
scientific wisdom the Earth is flat, and this heretic named Galileo was
branded a denier." On this issue Cruz is a flat-wronger. According to NASA,
"Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming
trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,
and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued
public statements endorsing this position."
"Imagine abolishing
the IRS," Senator Cruz said in his announcement Monday, "abolishing the
IRS ain't all that tough." But the IRS collects
$2.4 billion in taxes used to pay for the military, Social Security,
Medicare and other entitlement programs. Cruz proposes a flat tax.
However, if there are going to be federal taxes some agency will need to
collect them!
Ted Cruz, 44, was born in Canada, but he has since
given up his Canadian citizenship. His father, Rafael Cruz, is a
controversial evangelical Texas pastor who believes his son is the
anointed one. In a 2013 interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network,
Pastor Cruz recalled he told his then four-year old son, “'You know
Ted, you have been gifted above any man that I know and God has destined
you for greatness.' And I started making declarations about the Word of
God to him every day.”
Pastor Cruz has reportedly
embraced the Christian Dominionism theology, which believes that
Christians are called to take "dominion" over every aspect of the
American culture and use them to create God's kingdom on Earth in order
to bring about the return of Jesus Christ.
In his announcement
Monday, Senator Cruz said, “God’s blessing has been on America from the
very beginning of this nation, and I believe God isn’t done with America
yet.” He continued, “I believe in you. I believe in the power of
millions of courageous conservatives rising up to re-ignite the promise
of America.”
Cruz, a first-term Senator, is the first Republican
candidate to throw his hat into the ring. He will try to consolidate
his support among conservatives and Christian evangelicals. He has
repeatedly said that a moderate Republican cannot win the presidency.
In January he said,
"If we nominate another candidate in the mold of Bob Dole or John
McCain or Mitt Romney...the same people who stayed home in 2008 and 2012
will stay home in 2016 and the Democrats will win again. There is a
better way."
But many Republicans already believe that if Senator
Ted Cruz is their party's nominee there is no way they will win the
White House in 2016.
Showing posts with label Obamacare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obamacare. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 25, 2015
Sunday, November 2, 2014
Vote/Voto
It's a race to the finish line, but Republicans seem to have a decisive edge in Tuesday's midterm elections. Should the Republicans gain control of the Senate, they will control both houses of Congress and the consequences will be dramatic.
Turnout in the 2014 midterm elections may be a record low. Yet, the outcome may affect every American. The gridlock that currently plagues Washington will only increase with Republicans in control of the Senate. Memo to Democrats: an array of important issues, currently being blocked by the GOP, will either be bottled up or repealed.
The Democrat president has been stymied because it takes 60 votes in the Senate to end a filibuster that blocks legislation or nominations from passage. Currently the Democrats are unable to overcome this roadblock because they have a bare majority, and the Republicans have fully leveraged their position. A Republican majority in the Senate will mean open season for the party.
Take the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, which is the law of the land and has been implemented in many states. Presently, millions of formerly uninsured Americans are now covered by President Barack Obama's signature program. The law has had dramatically positive results, especially in helping to reduce the growth of health care costs. While the program is not perfect, it is working. Yet Senate Republicans, led by Texas Senator Ted Cruz, will be emboldened to kill this law. They see the ACA as an entitlement that must be eliminated.
Equal pay for women will be a lost cause. So will attempts to raise the minimum wage. Governor Chris Christie spoke for most Republicans when he recently said, “I’m tired of hearing about the minimum wage.” He continued, “I don’t think there’s a mother or a father sitting around a kitchen table tonight in America who are saying, ‘You know, honey, if our son or daughter could just make a higher minimum wage, my God, all our dreams would be realized.’” Yet most economists believe the minimum wage should be increased.
The Democrat controlled Senate passed an immigration reform bill, but the Republican House, under its Speaker John Boehner, has refused to vote on the measure. House Republicans want to close the southern borders and deport most illegals. Their idea of the Dream Act is sending all immigrants home who are here illegally. They actually believe that the illegals are taking jobs away from able Americans.
Several important government positions have not been filled because Republicans are sitting on the nominations. Should the Supreme Court have a vacancy, the GOP will do all they can to block any nomination by President Obama. They would prefer a nominee who will role back a woman's right to choose, same sex marriage, and allow interest groups to anonymously spend enormous amounts of money on their candidates. Their nominee would support expansion of voter ID laws, which adversely impact the elderly and minorities, typically Democrats.
If you think you have heard enough about the GOP manufactured scandals of Benghazi and IRS, which have been thoroughly investigated, you better fasten your seat belts. A Republican controlled Senate will spend millions of taxpayer dollars trying to score political points against Democrats, like Hillary Clinton, the party's probable 2016 presidential candidate. The will do so by opening new investigations and dragging them out through 2016.
It seems inexplicable that the "party of no" will gain control of Congress. Congressional Republicans have an approval rating of 21%, while 69% of those polled last month disapprove of Congressional Republicans. That is half the president's approval numbers. Yet the GOP may be rewarded with control of both Houses of Congress.
Following the 2008 Presidential Elections, Republican Senator Mitch McConnell, who is currently the Minority Leader, made it his number one priority to destroy President Obama and his agenda. He calculated that the president would bear the blame for a dysfunctional government, so McConnell did all he could to bollix up the works with partisan tactics, including shutting down the government. Now, even though he is unpopular in his home state of Kentucky, he is on the verge of being rewarded with reelection.
President Obama has been hammered by the GOP for his handling of ISIS, the ruthless terrorist group that has gained control of significant territory in Syria and Iraq. But it was the Republican President George Bush who lied to America to begin the Iraq war, which led to this mess. Had the president given arms two years ago to the so-called moderate factions fighting Syria's government, there would have still been an ISIS and Obama would have been blamed for arming the group.
Republicans are critical of the president's foreign policy. For instance, the removal of American combats troops from Iraq. Yet, the troop withdrawal was in accordance with a status of forces agreement negotiated by Bush.
Speaking of President Bush, his economic policies, based on traditional Republican principles and ideals, led to the worst recession this country has had since the Great Depression. The "trickle down" economic theory espoused by Republicans has not worked, and has led to a further gap in this country between rich and poor. President Obama has dug this country out of the deep economic hole he inherited, by increasing employment, reducing the deficit, and putting tougher banking regulations in place on "too big to fail" type institutions.
To those Democrats who don't think this election is important enough for them to exercise their precious right to vote, especially African Americans, Latinos, the young, and women, they will only have themselves to blame for what comes next.
Turnout in the 2014 midterm elections may be a record low. Yet, the outcome may affect every American. The gridlock that currently plagues Washington will only increase with Republicans in control of the Senate. Memo to Democrats: an array of important issues, currently being blocked by the GOP, will either be bottled up or repealed.
The Democrat president has been stymied because it takes 60 votes in the Senate to end a filibuster that blocks legislation or nominations from passage. Currently the Democrats are unable to overcome this roadblock because they have a bare majority, and the Republicans have fully leveraged their position. A Republican majority in the Senate will mean open season for the party.
Take the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, which is the law of the land and has been implemented in many states. Presently, millions of formerly uninsured Americans are now covered by President Barack Obama's signature program. The law has had dramatically positive results, especially in helping to reduce the growth of health care costs. While the program is not perfect, it is working. Yet Senate Republicans, led by Texas Senator Ted Cruz, will be emboldened to kill this law. They see the ACA as an entitlement that must be eliminated.
Equal pay for women will be a lost cause. So will attempts to raise the minimum wage. Governor Chris Christie spoke for most Republicans when he recently said, “I’m tired of hearing about the minimum wage.” He continued, “I don’t think there’s a mother or a father sitting around a kitchen table tonight in America who are saying, ‘You know, honey, if our son or daughter could just make a higher minimum wage, my God, all our dreams would be realized.’” Yet most economists believe the minimum wage should be increased.
The Democrat controlled Senate passed an immigration reform bill, but the Republican House, under its Speaker John Boehner, has refused to vote on the measure. House Republicans want to close the southern borders and deport most illegals. Their idea of the Dream Act is sending all immigrants home who are here illegally. They actually believe that the illegals are taking jobs away from able Americans.
Several important government positions have not been filled because Republicans are sitting on the nominations. Should the Supreme Court have a vacancy, the GOP will do all they can to block any nomination by President Obama. They would prefer a nominee who will role back a woman's right to choose, same sex marriage, and allow interest groups to anonymously spend enormous amounts of money on their candidates. Their nominee would support expansion of voter ID laws, which adversely impact the elderly and minorities, typically Democrats.
If you think you have heard enough about the GOP manufactured scandals of Benghazi and IRS, which have been thoroughly investigated, you better fasten your seat belts. A Republican controlled Senate will spend millions of taxpayer dollars trying to score political points against Democrats, like Hillary Clinton, the party's probable 2016 presidential candidate. The will do so by opening new investigations and dragging them out through 2016.
It seems inexplicable that the "party of no" will gain control of Congress. Congressional Republicans have an approval rating of 21%, while 69% of those polled last month disapprove of Congressional Republicans. That is half the president's approval numbers. Yet the GOP may be rewarded with control of both Houses of Congress.
Following the 2008 Presidential Elections, Republican Senator Mitch McConnell, who is currently the Minority Leader, made it his number one priority to destroy President Obama and his agenda. He calculated that the president would bear the blame for a dysfunctional government, so McConnell did all he could to bollix up the works with partisan tactics, including shutting down the government. Now, even though he is unpopular in his home state of Kentucky, he is on the verge of being rewarded with reelection.
President Obama has been hammered by the GOP for his handling of ISIS, the ruthless terrorist group that has gained control of significant territory in Syria and Iraq. But it was the Republican President George Bush who lied to America to begin the Iraq war, which led to this mess. Had the president given arms two years ago to the so-called moderate factions fighting Syria's government, there would have still been an ISIS and Obama would have been blamed for arming the group.
Republicans are critical of the president's foreign policy. For instance, the removal of American combats troops from Iraq. Yet, the troop withdrawal was in accordance with a status of forces agreement negotiated by Bush.
Speaking of President Bush, his economic policies, based on traditional Republican principles and ideals, led to the worst recession this country has had since the Great Depression. The "trickle down" economic theory espoused by Republicans has not worked, and has led to a further gap in this country between rich and poor. President Obama has dug this country out of the deep economic hole he inherited, by increasing employment, reducing the deficit, and putting tougher banking regulations in place on "too big to fail" type institutions.
To those Democrats who don't think this election is important enough for them to exercise their precious right to vote, especially African Americans, Latinos, the young, and women, they will only have themselves to blame for what comes next.
Wednesday, April 2, 2014
Pivot Point for Democrats
The 2014 midterm elections are little more than
six months away, and already the Republican Party is feeling giddy about the
prospect of big wins in several U.S. Senate races, perhaps enough to give the
GOP control of both houses of Congress. This may appear to be surprising if one
considers that Republicans are in the minority nationally on most key social
and economic issues, especially among Blacks, Latinos and women.
Most Republicans want to repeal the Affordable
Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare, but they can't agree among themselves on how to
replace it. And they were dealt a bit of a blow when President Barack Obama
announced Tuesday that more than seven million Americans had signed up for
health care by the deadline, far exceeding expectations. That number is likely
to be much higher when the final count is in.
Now the health care law is starting to pick up
some positive momentum, with a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll showing 49%
of all Americans now support the law, while 48% oppose it. That is nearly a 10%
swing to the positive since last November. And the ACA's favorability rating is
likely to improve since the enrollment numbers were so strong, and most of the
Republican lies and myths about the law have been shown to be untrue.
So a Republican controlled Congress will likely
do all it can to bring an end to Obamacare, even if it is piece by piece. What
makes Obamacare so repugnant to many Republicans is that it is viewed as
another "government handout," like food stamps, unemployment insurance
and many social programs. Their view is that the poor and hungry are largely
freeloaders. So if Republicans get their way on Obamacare, several million
people who now have signed up for the ACA will lose health care and have
nothing to replace it.
A majority of Americans across the nation do
not agree with Republicans on most social issues, like same sex marriage and
equal pay for women. Many states, heavily gerrymandered following big GOP wins
in the 2010 state legislative and gubernatorial races, are slowly rolling back
existing social reforms.
The Republican Party is made up largely of
older and white voters. These are the very people who are most likely to vote
during off-year elections, especially when Republicans play on their fears. For
instance, the fallacious cries of death panels? Or the ridiculous charge that
Obama has become the "imperial president." Or, that Obama is
violating the constitution and should be impeached!
Unfortunately for
Democrats, many of those who are mobilized by fear and anti-Obama feelings are
typically not well informed. They are easy prey for GOP political spinmeisters.
And there is no penalty for lying about your opponent.
President Obama was reelected by a sizable
margin with the help of young people, minorities and women. But these voter
groups do not usually turn out in large numbers for midterm elections. To make
matters worse for Democrats, Republican controlled state legislatures are doing
all they can to restrict voting access in many states. For instance, some
states have voted to end voting on Sundays, the only day many minorities, who
work long hours and travel great distances to work, can vote without a loss of
pay. Some Republican controlled statehouses have reduced the number of polling
places, frequently choosing to close those in more heavily Democratic
districts. Republicans claim this is all due to incidents of voter fraud, but
the facts show that the number of voter fraud cases nationally is minuscule.
Of course, Republicans are against any
meaningful immigration reform. They believe that most immigrants who become
citizens will also become Democrats. I wonder why that would happen?
Meanwhile, in
Washington Tuesday, Congressman Paul Ryan (R-WI), the party's budget guru, drew
fire from all sides with his latest federal budget proposal. The Ryan budget
calls for deep cuts in so-called safety net programs, education, job training,
Pell Grants, and for transforming some social programs into "block
grants," which will leave each state to deal with the program. He also
proposes huge tax breaks for the rich. Democrats see Ryan's budget as a real
liability for Republicans. But, not surprisingly, conservative Republicans
think it doesn't go far enough.
Take, for
instance, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. "The latest Ryan budget is
not an April Fool's joke," Palin wrote on her Facebook page Tuesday,
"But it really IS a joke because it is STILL not seeing the problem; it
STILL is not proposing reining in wasteful government overspending." The
Palin posting reflects the vast schism that currently exists within the
Republican Party.
Yet, because
more "red state" senate seats are up this election, Republicans are
poised to make some major gains. The challenge for Democrats will be to
mobilize the Obama coalition.
You think
there is gridlock in Washington now? If the GOP wins both houses of Congress in
November, nothing meaningful will get done for two years, and many good social
programs will come under crippling attack. Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA)
will endlessly bask in the television lights as he wastes even more American
taxpayer money investigating everything from Benghazi to the First Family's
dogs.
Democrats
must begin a full court press around the many accomplishments of President
Obama, especially Obamacare. Democrats must go on the offensive now, and rally
party supporters, especially the young, minorities, and women, from coast to
coast. Democrats must make sure that all Americans fully understand what they
may lose if they do not vote this coming November.
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Promises, Obama Promises
President Barack Obama may be a rare exception for a politician because he has actually kept most of his campaign promises. And he has done so in spite of the most partisan and dishonest opposition tactics an American president has ever faced.
The president announced this past weekend that the U.S. and its allies had reached a short-term agreement with Iran on its nuclear enrichment program, opponents flew into a furor, even before they had specific details. Some Republican members of Congress even accused the president of manufacturing the agreement as a diversion from his problems with the Obamacare rollout.
Understandably, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the agreement a "Historic mistake," and said, "The world became a more dangerous place." Saudi Arabia at first expressed concern, but later reversed itself saying, "The government of the kingdom sees that if there was goodwill, this agreement could represent a preliminary step towards a comprehensive solution to the Iranian nuclear program."
The president addressed the controversy in San Francisco Monday, saying the United States "cannot close the door on diplomacy." Of his critics, he said, "Tough talk and bluster may be the easy thing to do politically, but it's not the right thing for our security."
The president first signaled his intention to pursue diplomacy with Iran during the 2008 Presidential Campaign when he said he would be willing to meet with America's enemies without preconditions. At the time he was considered naive, and even radical. Also in 2008, President Obama promised he would end the war in Iraq, wind down war in Afghanistan, and he would bring terrorist Osama bin Laden to justice. He has delivered on all those promises.
This agreement gives Iran a six month window in which to reach an agreement that would ban it from building a nuclear weapon. Iran was brought to the table by crippling sanctions that have cratered its economy. Under the agreement, most of those sanctions remain in place, and can be instantly ramped up should Iran be found in violation during the next six months.
The point is that, for very little cost, the United States has opened a peaceful path to a verifiable and enduring nuclear agreement with Iran that would make the world safer. It has also given Iran's new more "moderate" leadership something with which to strengthen its tenuous grip on power. Realistically, reaching a long-term agreement will be a huge challenge for all sides. But, for now, the president has done all he can to keep the U.S. out of another war.
The president could use some good news given the shaky rollout of Obamacare. He had promised in 2008 to make affordable health care available to all Americans, including the 40 million citizens who do not have coverage. He and his allies had fought hard against long odds to make the ACA the law of the land. Republicans have done all they can to defund or repeal the law, to no avail, even though they have no replacement to offer Americans.
But now, in spite of a failed website, the Affordable Care Act is beginning to gain traction. In fact, in California, where the state runs its own program, enrollment results are ahead of projections. California is a test case that proves Obamacare can work if states are willing to give it a fair shot. Most states that have Republican governors have opted out, but they are likely to opt in once the program gains momentum.
The president was elected twice by the American people. Of President Obama, Shakespeare might have said, "He was ever precise in promise-making." But the reality is, as the old saying goes, "A politician is known by the promises he keeps."
Understandably, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the agreement a "Historic mistake," and said, "The world became a more dangerous place." Saudi Arabia at first expressed concern, but later reversed itself saying, "The government of the kingdom sees that if there was goodwill, this agreement could represent a preliminary step towards a comprehensive solution to the Iranian nuclear program."
The president addressed the controversy in San Francisco Monday, saying the United States "cannot close the door on diplomacy." Of his critics, he said, "Tough talk and bluster may be the easy thing to do politically, but it's not the right thing for our security."
The president first signaled his intention to pursue diplomacy with Iran during the 2008 Presidential Campaign when he said he would be willing to meet with America's enemies without preconditions. At the time he was considered naive, and even radical. Also in 2008, President Obama promised he would end the war in Iraq, wind down war in Afghanistan, and he would bring terrorist Osama bin Laden to justice. He has delivered on all those promises.
This agreement gives Iran a six month window in which to reach an agreement that would ban it from building a nuclear weapon. Iran was brought to the table by crippling sanctions that have cratered its economy. Under the agreement, most of those sanctions remain in place, and can be instantly ramped up should Iran be found in violation during the next six months.
The point is that, for very little cost, the United States has opened a peaceful path to a verifiable and enduring nuclear agreement with Iran that would make the world safer. It has also given Iran's new more "moderate" leadership something with which to strengthen its tenuous grip on power. Realistically, reaching a long-term agreement will be a huge challenge for all sides. But, for now, the president has done all he can to keep the U.S. out of another war.
The president could use some good news given the shaky rollout of Obamacare. He had promised in 2008 to make affordable health care available to all Americans, including the 40 million citizens who do not have coverage. He and his allies had fought hard against long odds to make the ACA the law of the land. Republicans have done all they can to defund or repeal the law, to no avail, even though they have no replacement to offer Americans.
But now, in spite of a failed website, the Affordable Care Act is beginning to gain traction. In fact, in California, where the state runs its own program, enrollment results are ahead of projections. California is a test case that proves Obamacare can work if states are willing to give it a fair shot. Most states that have Republican governors have opted out, but they are likely to opt in once the program gains momentum.
The president was elected twice by the American people. Of President Obama, Shakespeare might have said, "He was ever precise in promise-making." But the reality is, as the old saying goes, "A politician is known by the promises he keeps."
Saturday, November 9, 2013
Obamacare: Don't Stop Believing
|
Sunday, October 20, 2013
Fix the Glitches
The government shutdown was a misguided and senseless tactic that cost American taxpayers at least $24 billion and damaged the Republican brand. But the error-plagued rollout of the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, has given the GOP a way to change the conversation.
Senator Ted Cruz's reckless strategy to defund Obamacare was never going to succeed. But he knew that. However, the ambitious Cruz saw it as tremendous opportunity to galvanize Tea Party members behind his leadership. And, while moderate Republicans call his maneuvers a "fool's errand," there is no question Cruz has now won the loyal support of many on the right.
Yet many Republicans are shaking their heads in frustration because the Cruz shutdown has taken attention away from Obamacare's problems. "The fiasco of rollout has been obscured because of this internecine strife that's been going on in the Republican Party," Senator John McCain (R-AZ) said Sunday on CNN. "Keep up the fight against Obamacare, but don't shut down the government and have so much collateral damage to innocent Americans."
However, out of the GOP wreckage will quickly emerge an all out attack against the problem-plagued launch of Obamacare. On CBS's Face the Nation Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called Obamacare, "The worst piece of legislation passed in the last half century...we need to get rid of it." He claimed that even if one can get on the site, they will find fewer choices and higher costs.
Democrats recognize that the faulty rollout is an issue ripe for exploitation. Last week on MSNBC, Former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs called it, "Excruciatingly embarrassing for the White House and for the Department of Health and Human Services." On ABC's This Week, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called the problems "unacceptable." She added, "This has to be fixed, but what doesn't have to be fixed is the fact the tens of millions of more people will have access to affordable healthcare, quality healthcare. That no longer having a preexisting medical condition will bar you from getting affordable care."
The White House and HHS have had years to prepare for the launch of Obamacare. All along they have said that Republicans oppose it because Americans will fall in love with it once it is available. But now the architects of President Obama's signature legislative achievement are vulnerable to attack and relentless scrutiny from Congressional Committees. Republicans would like nothing more than to turn Obamacare against Democrats in the 2014-midterm elections.
Already Republican Chairmen Fred Upton, of the House Energy and Commerce Committee has announced he will investigate. "It is well past time for the administration to be straight and transparent with the American people," he said in a statement last week. For instance, how many millions of dollars were spent to design the error plagued software? Whose fault is it that the program has failed?
President Obama is expected to address the health care glitches on Monday. While making health care accessible for all remains a worthy goal, and millions of people have already tried to learn more about the offerings, the problems must be quickly remedied. If the president fails to make that happen, Obamacare may damage his ability to achieve any further legislative successes.
Mr. Obama has already stated his intention to pivot onto the difficult and complex issue of immigration reform. He has also indicated he is interested in achieving a budget deal with Republicans that will include infrastructure, tax and entitlement reform. But the problems with Obamacare will weaken his position.
Republicans are mindful of the words once spoken by the president's former chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste."
Senator Ted Cruz's reckless strategy to defund Obamacare was never going to succeed. But he knew that. However, the ambitious Cruz saw it as tremendous opportunity to galvanize Tea Party members behind his leadership. And, while moderate Republicans call his maneuvers a "fool's errand," there is no question Cruz has now won the loyal support of many on the right.
Yet many Republicans are shaking their heads in frustration because the Cruz shutdown has taken attention away from Obamacare's problems. "The fiasco of rollout has been obscured because of this internecine strife that's been going on in the Republican Party," Senator John McCain (R-AZ) said Sunday on CNN. "Keep up the fight against Obamacare, but don't shut down the government and have so much collateral damage to innocent Americans."
However, out of the GOP wreckage will quickly emerge an all out attack against the problem-plagued launch of Obamacare. On CBS's Face the Nation Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called Obamacare, "The worst piece of legislation passed in the last half century...we need to get rid of it." He claimed that even if one can get on the site, they will find fewer choices and higher costs.
Democrats recognize that the faulty rollout is an issue ripe for exploitation. Last week on MSNBC, Former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs called it, "Excruciatingly embarrassing for the White House and for the Department of Health and Human Services." On ABC's This Week, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called the problems "unacceptable." She added, "This has to be fixed, but what doesn't have to be fixed is the fact the tens of millions of more people will have access to affordable healthcare, quality healthcare. That no longer having a preexisting medical condition will bar you from getting affordable care."
The White House and HHS have had years to prepare for the launch of Obamacare. All along they have said that Republicans oppose it because Americans will fall in love with it once it is available. But now the architects of President Obama's signature legislative achievement are vulnerable to attack and relentless scrutiny from Congressional Committees. Republicans would like nothing more than to turn Obamacare against Democrats in the 2014-midterm elections.
Already Republican Chairmen Fred Upton, of the House Energy and Commerce Committee has announced he will investigate. "It is well past time for the administration to be straight and transparent with the American people," he said in a statement last week. For instance, how many millions of dollars were spent to design the error plagued software? Whose fault is it that the program has failed?
President Obama is expected to address the health care glitches on Monday. While making health care accessible for all remains a worthy goal, and millions of people have already tried to learn more about the offerings, the problems must be quickly remedied. If the president fails to make that happen, Obamacare may damage his ability to achieve any further legislative successes.
Mr. Obama has already stated his intention to pivot onto the difficult and complex issue of immigration reform. He has also indicated he is interested in achieving a budget deal with Republicans that will include infrastructure, tax and entitlement reform. But the problems with Obamacare will weaken his position.
Republicans are mindful of the words once spoken by the president's former chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste."
Sunday, October 13, 2013
What Hath Cruz Wrought?
With very little time remaining until the U.S. government technically
goes into default on its debt, Senate Republicans and Democrats
struggle to reach a short-term solution that would end the partial
government shutdown and raise the debt ceiling. Of course, both
parties say they are fighting for the American people, yet the American
people are the biggest losers no matter the outcome of this latest
skirmish.
How ridiculous was it that Texas Senator Ted Cruz decided to lead an effort to defund the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare, in exchange for keeping the government open and raising the debt ceiling. Senator Cruz knew full well that the Senate would not take the matter up, and the president would not go along with overturning his signature achievement. Even leading Republicans in both houses acknowledge it was the wrong strategy.
Now, in the height of hypocrisy, Senator Cruz joined his close friend, Utah Senator Mike Lee, and several Republicans Sunday to protest the government closing of the World War II Memorial in Washington. A small crowd gathered at the barriers chanted, "Tear down these walls." Senator Cruz said that the Obama administration was using veterans as pawns. What phony outrage! Cruz and Lee are the architects of the shutdown.
A new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows that 53 percent of the public blames Republicans, while 31 percent blame President Barack Obama. The poll shows that Republicans are getting more blame this year than they did when the government last shutdown in 1995-96. And the poll shows Cruz with a 14 percent favorable, 28 percent unfavorable rating. Surprisingly, the poll shows that while the government debate has gone on, Obamacare has gotten more popular, although it is still under water overall.
Utah's Senator Mike Lee has been a loyal and ardent supporter of his close friend Ted Cruz. He has received warm praise from his colleague for being a great leader and public servant. Lee even helped fill in during Cruz's fake filibuster on the Senate floor last month. But even Lee should be privately asking himself, what hath Cruz wrought?
Senator Lee's favorable/unfavorable rating has taken a big hit according to a Brigham University poll released last week. A majority of the respondents now view Lee unfavorably, a twenty point swing since June. And a poll from Utah's Deseret News revealed that most of the state's voters don't believe that interrupting government functions to stop Obamacare is a good idea.
A recent report estimates that the shutdown is hurting Utah 14th worst when compared to the other states and the District of Columbia. In fact, the report, by WalletHub, found, "States won by the Republican Party in the 2012 presidential election could be hit disproportionately hard by a prolonged government shutdown, as 15 such Red States ranked in the top 25 in the study's overall 'at-risk' rankings."
So it is no wonder Lee is losing support. Kirk Jowers, head of the University of Utah's Hinckley Institute of Politics, told Time Magazine, "Utahans expect effectiveness and efficiency and results out of their government, not ideological tantrums." But Washington has devolved into nothing but ideological tantrums and trust in government is at an all-time low.
From its very inception the Tea Party's goal has been to blow the federal government up. Close the place down. Default on the debt. Whatever it takes to get federal deficits under control, including "starving the beast." Tea Party Congressmen are all from gerrymandered districts that are 100% safe. They do not have to worry about what is best for America, and most Americans. Meanwhile, the House leadership fears the Tea Party.
Only in Washington would the very people who caused the government shutdown, and possibly a catastrophic government default, demonstrate against the shutdown. Confused? Well there is no better practitioner of perception deception than Senator Ted Cruz.
One citizen at the WWII Memorial perhaps spoke for most Americans, "This is ridiculous. This is not just and fair. It's just not fair."
How ridiculous was it that Texas Senator Ted Cruz decided to lead an effort to defund the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare, in exchange for keeping the government open and raising the debt ceiling. Senator Cruz knew full well that the Senate would not take the matter up, and the president would not go along with overturning his signature achievement. Even leading Republicans in both houses acknowledge it was the wrong strategy.
Now, in the height of hypocrisy, Senator Cruz joined his close friend, Utah Senator Mike Lee, and several Republicans Sunday to protest the government closing of the World War II Memorial in Washington. A small crowd gathered at the barriers chanted, "Tear down these walls." Senator Cruz said that the Obama administration was using veterans as pawns. What phony outrage! Cruz and Lee are the architects of the shutdown.
A new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows that 53 percent of the public blames Republicans, while 31 percent blame President Barack Obama. The poll shows that Republicans are getting more blame this year than they did when the government last shutdown in 1995-96. And the poll shows Cruz with a 14 percent favorable, 28 percent unfavorable rating. Surprisingly, the poll shows that while the government debate has gone on, Obamacare has gotten more popular, although it is still under water overall.
Utah's Senator Mike Lee has been a loyal and ardent supporter of his close friend Ted Cruz. He has received warm praise from his colleague for being a great leader and public servant. Lee even helped fill in during Cruz's fake filibuster on the Senate floor last month. But even Lee should be privately asking himself, what hath Cruz wrought?
Senator Lee's favorable/unfavorable rating has taken a big hit according to a Brigham University poll released last week. A majority of the respondents now view Lee unfavorably, a twenty point swing since June. And a poll from Utah's Deseret News revealed that most of the state's voters don't believe that interrupting government functions to stop Obamacare is a good idea.
A recent report estimates that the shutdown is hurting Utah 14th worst when compared to the other states and the District of Columbia. In fact, the report, by WalletHub, found, "States won by the Republican Party in the 2012 presidential election could be hit disproportionately hard by a prolonged government shutdown, as 15 such Red States ranked in the top 25 in the study's overall 'at-risk' rankings."
So it is no wonder Lee is losing support. Kirk Jowers, head of the University of Utah's Hinckley Institute of Politics, told Time Magazine, "Utahans expect effectiveness and efficiency and results out of their government, not ideological tantrums." But Washington has devolved into nothing but ideological tantrums and trust in government is at an all-time low.
From its very inception the Tea Party's goal has been to blow the federal government up. Close the place down. Default on the debt. Whatever it takes to get federal deficits under control, including "starving the beast." Tea Party Congressmen are all from gerrymandered districts that are 100% safe. They do not have to worry about what is best for America, and most Americans. Meanwhile, the House leadership fears the Tea Party.
Only in Washington would the very people who caused the government shutdown, and possibly a catastrophic government default, demonstrate against the shutdown. Confused? Well there is no better practitioner of perception deception than Senator Ted Cruz.
One citizen at the WWII Memorial perhaps spoke for most Americans, "This is ridiculous. This is not just and fair. It's just not fair."
Friday, October 4, 2013
GOP Shutdown Politics
"This
isn't a damn game!" House Speaker John Boehner said Friday at a news
conference on the budget stalemate that has led to the government
shutdown. Really Mr. Speaker? The government shutdown is, in fact,
a direct result of political gamesmanship by the Republicans.
Let's
start with Texas Senator Ted Cruz, the Narcissus of Capitol Hill. No one
loves Senator Ted Cruz more than, well, Ted Cruz. And it is no
wonder. This man holds himself in the highest esteem, walks with swagger,
and drips with ambition. Throughout his lifetime, all of his
actions, associations and alliances have been undertaken solely for the
advancement of Ted Cruz.
He
is clearly far smarter than your average Tea-Party Congressmen, so he is
leading them around by their noses on his little ego trip. And they love
it because they each get to fulfill their lifelong dream of destroying the
federal government, which they believe is at the root of all this country's
problems. They are elected from gerrymandered districts that are filled
with white hyper-conservative citizens who can be mobilized at the drop of an
anti-Obama epithet.
Meanwhile,
Cruz has the admiring backing of Fox News and conservative radio talk show
hosts, who are promulgating lies and distortions about the shutdown to rally
their rabid Republican base. The more outlandish the criticism on these
right-wing outlets, the more the audience loves it. (Just don't try
to take their federal benefits away!)
Tea-Party
Republicans are downright giddy that they have forced the federal government to
shut down. "We’re very excited," said Rep. Michele Bachmann
(R-Mn). "It's exactly what we wanted, and we got it."
Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-Ks) observed, "America's been a little astonished by
us doing the right thing in the last few days here in the
House."
Nonetheless,
the wiser Republican leadership has been flummoxed to by the negative public
perception of the party as a result of the Cruz-driven strategy to shut the
government down unless the Affordable Care Law, or Obamacare, is
defunded. Word of dissension in the party ranks has only added to the
party's image problems. Leaders have been scrambling to change the
optics, to shift blame to President Obama and the Democrats.
So
it was particularly noteworthy when Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and
Senator Rand Paul, both Kentucky Republicans, were caught in an embarrassing
conversation on the senate floor by a Kentucky TV station. They
were talking about messaging strategy; neither man wanted the government
shutdown.
Paul
approached McConnell on the floor following his CNN interview. McConnell
began by warning Paul he was "wired up here." But that didn't
stop Paul, who was eager to share a powerful revelation that had come to
him. "I just did CNN and I just go over and over again 'We're
(Republicans) willing to compromise. 'We're willing to negotiate.'
I think... I don't think they (Democrats) poll tested we won't negotiate.
I think it's awful for them to say that over and over again," Paul said.
McConnell responded, "Yeah, I do too and I, and I just came back from that two hour meeting with them and that, and that was basically the same view privately as it was publicly." McConnell was apparently referring to the meeting between President Obama and the Congressional leadership.
McConnell responded, "Yeah, I do too and I, and I just came back from that two hour meeting with them and that, and that was basically the same view privately as it was publicly." McConnell was apparently referring to the meeting between President Obama and the Congressional leadership.
Paul added, "I think if we keep saying 'We wanted to defund it (Obamacare). We fought for that and that we're willing to compromise on this', I think they can't, we're gonna, I think... well I know we don't want to be here, but we're gonna win this I think." So neither Congressmen wants the shutdown, but they are now both think they will "win" this debate by shifting blame to the Democrats, whose position they can summarize as "they don't want to negotiate" on the budget or debt ceiling.
This,
of course, assumes that most Americans won't understand that that Democrats
have already agreed to huge cuts, basically continuing the
"sequester" levels that have already been disruptive to government
agencies and services. Or that Democrats have consistently said they will
negotiate after a budget bill is passed and the debt ceiling is raised; or that
Democrats have said they are willing to make some adjustments in the Affordable
Care Act.
Meanwhile,
Republicans have consistently said they will never agree to a new budget, or to
raise the debt ceiling, unless Obamacare is defunded. The lower house has voted
42 times along party lines to defund Obamacare. Republicans have
wasted precious time and valuable taxpayer dollars trying to eliminate a law
that was passed by congress, signed by the president, upheld by the U.S.
Supreme Court, and that President Obama was reelected on.
Instead
of passing even a short-term budget, so 800,000 federal employees can go back
to work, and services can be restored to the poor and needy of all ages,
Republicans have focused on winning the battle in the court of public
opinion. Instead of agreeing not to let this country's credit rating be
destroyed, which will be devastating for the global economy, Republicans are
trying to win the perception game.
Speaker
Boehner, your protestations about this not being a game are empty because of
the actions of you and your party. All American can see the games
Republicans are playing. It is
time for you to do the right thing for the country -- bring the senate-approved
budget to the floor for a vote.
And
don't forget what happened to Narcissus.
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Clipping the Wings of Cruz
Texas Senator Ted Cruz knows exactly what he is doing and he is
achieving all of his goals. His disruptive tactics are winning him
acclaim from conservative Americans who disdain all things Washington, while
the Republican establishment is fuming with anger.
Rafael Edward "Ted" Cruz was
born in Canada but has been a Texan pretty much all his life. From his
earliest days he has been ambitious and driven. He was valedictorian of
his high school class. He graduated cum laude from Princeton University
in 1992, and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School in 1995. Harvard Law
professor Alan Desrhowitz once said, "Cruz was off the charts
brilliant."
Cruz clerked for Chief Justice William
Rehnquist, the first Latino to clerk for a chief justice. He went into private
practice before joining the Bush-Cheney campaign in 1999. He worked in
the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission before being appointed
Texas Solicitor General in 2003. As a lawyer, Cruz has authored more than
80 U.S. Supreme Court briefs, and has presented nine oral arguments before the
court. Cruz is a gun-rights supporter, he has defended the rights of
students to recite the Pledge of Allegiance in classrooms, and he opposes
same-sex marriage.
But President Barack Obama's Affordable
Care Act, or Obamacare, has given Cruz the opportunity to quickly increase his
national profile and collect deep-pocketed supporters. Like the Calgary
Stampeder he is by birth, he has shaken up the political arena by insisting
that Congress defund Obamacare as a condition for keeping the government open.
But his twist in logic is that it will be President Obama's fault if the
government shuts down. And, in another amazing twist, Cruz has promised to
filibuster in the Senate the very budget bill that defunds Obamacare he asked
the House of Representatives to pass.
Cruz defended his tactics to Fox News,
"I mean folks can do whatever they want to resist change, and there are a
lot of people that have been in Washington a long time that are fearful of change,"
he said. "They're fearful of risk, they're fearful of anything that
changes the clubby way Washington does business." Brilliant! And
this sentiment reflects the feelings of many tea-party Americans.
Furthermore, it has won the strong endorsement of former Alaska Governor
and vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin. Palin is an opportunist as well.
Cruz believes that if his efforts to
defund Obamacare fail, his supporters will respect him for standing up for
principle. So the more criticism he receives, the better for his future.
As he said to Fox News, "No matter what insults others choose to hurl at
me, and in the past few weeks they have picked quit a few, some of them have
been pretty amusing actually, but no matter what they do I'm not going to
respond in kind." Ah, the high road.
There is an old saying that applies perfectly to Ted Cruz: "Never in doubt, seldom right."
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Compassionless Conservatves
The Republican Party is vigorously pursing reductions in the federal budget that will severely impact those who most need help. What is worse, many in the party are willing to shut the government down and disrupt the global economy in order to make their point.
Republicans in the House of Representatives, led by Speaker John Boehner, have scheduled a vote Friday on legislation to fund the government through Dec. 15 at existing levels while permanently defunding the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. The same bill will include a requirement for Treasury to give priority to Social Security and disability payments in the event the government reaches its borrowing limit and cannot pay all of its obligations. The plan is then for the Senate to take up the measure, even though Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev, says that such a measure will not pass.
Some 48 million Americans are uninsured, and the Republicans have offered no viable alternatives for the law. Obamacare remains unpopular with Americans mainly because the public has misunderstood it and conservatives have demonized it. Cries of death panels and deficits overshadow the many benefits that the law puts in place. For instance, providing health insurance to everyone, requiring insurance companies to cover people with preexisting health conditions, ending lifetime limits on coverage, providing coverage to adults under 26, and reigning in health care costs.
Senator Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has been among the most vocal proponents for defunding Obamacare at all costs. While House and Senate Republicans have sparred over which chamber should take the lead, Cruz now says he will do "everything necessary and anything possible to defund Obamacare," including filibuster any funding bill in the Senate that funds the Affordable Care Act. Earlier he had received the ire of many House Republicans because, after stoking up grassroots opposition in Republican districts around the country, Cruz conceded he could not get such a measure through the Senate.
If Congress doesn't pass a spending bill by September 30 the government will partially shut down. And if Congress fails to raise the federal government's debt ceiling later in October, the USA will default and throw the global markets into economic chaos.
But some Republicans in Congress love to play brinksmanship, and have stirred up support among their core voters, all in an effort to change the way Washington does business. Such tactics can also get an ambitious Senator more national attention and enhance political fundraising efforts.
But Obamacare is the law of the land. It was approved by Congress, was signed by the president, and was upheld by the United States Supreme Court. The president will veto any measure that would kill his most significant domestic accomplishment. So the defund effort is a fool's errand and many Republicans know it. The Wall Street Journal concluded that the defunding strategy will backfire on Republicans, "The kamikazes could end up ensuring the return of all-Democratic rule." GOP strategist Karl Rove wrote, "Going down that road would strengthen the president while alienating independents. It is an ill-conceived tactic, and Republicans should reject it."
Meanwhile, House Republicans have voted to cut $4 billion a year out of food stamps over the next decade. The controversial measure will force about 14 million people off the program by 2013. 48 million Americans currently get food stamps, or about 15% of the U.S. population. House Republicans say their bill would eliminate those who shouldn't get food stamps by closing loopholes and cutting benefits to "able-bodied adults" unless they work part time or are in a job training program. It is estimated that 3.8 million people will lose benefits in the first year.
Both these initiatives come at a time when the Census Bureau announced that the number of Americans living in poverty has climbed to 46.5 million. Remarkably about 16 million children and 4 million seniors are now living in poverty in America. While most of the 8 million jobs lost during the recession have been recouped, many of those jobs are in low paying service industry. Meanwhile the nation's economic recovery remains tepid, in part due to state and federal government cutbacks. Yet corporate profits are rising and the wealthiest 1% of Americans are doing better than ever.
So, just when so many Americans desperately need help and are most vulnerable, the Republicans are most determined to cut the deficit on the backs of the poor, and to deny every citizen access to proper health care.
So it goes with the compassionless conservatives of today's Republican Party.
Republicans in the House of Representatives, led by Speaker John Boehner, have scheduled a vote Friday on legislation to fund the government through Dec. 15 at existing levels while permanently defunding the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. The same bill will include a requirement for Treasury to give priority to Social Security and disability payments in the event the government reaches its borrowing limit and cannot pay all of its obligations. The plan is then for the Senate to take up the measure, even though Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev, says that such a measure will not pass.
Some 48 million Americans are uninsured, and the Republicans have offered no viable alternatives for the law. Obamacare remains unpopular with Americans mainly because the public has misunderstood it and conservatives have demonized it. Cries of death panels and deficits overshadow the many benefits that the law puts in place. For instance, providing health insurance to everyone, requiring insurance companies to cover people with preexisting health conditions, ending lifetime limits on coverage, providing coverage to adults under 26, and reigning in health care costs.
Senator Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has been among the most vocal proponents for defunding Obamacare at all costs. While House and Senate Republicans have sparred over which chamber should take the lead, Cruz now says he will do "everything necessary and anything possible to defund Obamacare," including filibuster any funding bill in the Senate that funds the Affordable Care Act. Earlier he had received the ire of many House Republicans because, after stoking up grassroots opposition in Republican districts around the country, Cruz conceded he could not get such a measure through the Senate.
If Congress doesn't pass a spending bill by September 30 the government will partially shut down. And if Congress fails to raise the federal government's debt ceiling later in October, the USA will default and throw the global markets into economic chaos.
But some Republicans in Congress love to play brinksmanship, and have stirred up support among their core voters, all in an effort to change the way Washington does business. Such tactics can also get an ambitious Senator more national attention and enhance political fundraising efforts.
But Obamacare is the law of the land. It was approved by Congress, was signed by the president, and was upheld by the United States Supreme Court. The president will veto any measure that would kill his most significant domestic accomplishment. So the defund effort is a fool's errand and many Republicans know it. The Wall Street Journal concluded that the defunding strategy will backfire on Republicans, "The kamikazes could end up ensuring the return of all-Democratic rule." GOP strategist Karl Rove wrote, "Going down that road would strengthen the president while alienating independents. It is an ill-conceived tactic, and Republicans should reject it."
Meanwhile, House Republicans have voted to cut $4 billion a year out of food stamps over the next decade. The controversial measure will force about 14 million people off the program by 2013. 48 million Americans currently get food stamps, or about 15% of the U.S. population. House Republicans say their bill would eliminate those who shouldn't get food stamps by closing loopholes and cutting benefits to "able-bodied adults" unless they work part time or are in a job training program. It is estimated that 3.8 million people will lose benefits in the first year.
Both these initiatives come at a time when the Census Bureau announced that the number of Americans living in poverty has climbed to 46.5 million. Remarkably about 16 million children and 4 million seniors are now living in poverty in America. While most of the 8 million jobs lost during the recession have been recouped, many of those jobs are in low paying service industry. Meanwhile the nation's economic recovery remains tepid, in part due to state and federal government cutbacks. Yet corporate profits are rising and the wealthiest 1% of Americans are doing better than ever.
So, just when so many Americans desperately need help and are most vulnerable, the Republicans are most determined to cut the deficit on the backs of the poor, and to deny every citizen access to proper health care.
So it goes with the compassionless conservatives of today's Republican Party.
Wednesday, August 21, 2013
Cruz Control
Texas Senator Ted Cruz is rallying the conservative base of the Republican Party with a simple message. "A
significant amount of Republicans assume, with an impasse, that
President Obama will never ever give up his principles, so
Republicans have to give up theirs," Cruz said Tuesday evening at a town hall meeting. "If you have an impasse,
you know -- one side or the other has to blink. How do we win this
fight? Don't blink." But the ambitious Cruz knows better, and so do many in the Republican Party.
The ever-cocksure Cruz has set his sites on defunding Obamacare at all costs. "Under no circumstances will I vote for a continuing resolution that funds even one penny of Obamacare," Cruz said in his town hall remarks. But a continuing resolution is necessary to provide funds for the federal government to operate. If Congress fails to act in a timely manner it risks shutting down the government.
A growing number of leading Republicans are opposed to this strategy because they believe that the GOP will be blamed for the consequences. "I think it's the dumbest idea I've ever heard of," Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., said last month. "I'm for stopping Obamacare, but shutting down the government will not stop Obamacare," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told a Kentucky town hall meeting earlier this month. And Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., commissioned a Congressional Research Service report that shows that the health care law would get its funding even if the rest of the government shuts down.
Former John McCain presidential campaign aide Nicolle Wallace said on MSNBC Wednesday, “The reason we’re going to lose this debate about defunding Obamacare is because we don’t occupy the White House." She added, “We don’t have the ability to pass laws and then sign them. The best way to win this fight is to elect a Republican president.” Wallace also denounced Cruz for doing "a whole lot of fear mongering" and being "intellectually dishonest" when he was asked at a recent event about impeaching the president. She said Cruz responded, "Because we don't have the votes (in Congress)." Wallace bluntly corrected the senator, "The true answer, the intellectually honest answer: Because he’s not committed an impeachable offense."
Senator Cruz is on a crusade to become president. He has deftly deflected criticism that he may not qualify because he was born in Canada. Most constitutional scholars appear to agree he does in fact qualify because his mother is American, though it says nothing about persons with a dual citizenship. Cruz said in a statement Monday, "Now the Dallas Morning News says that I may technically have dual citizenship. Assuming that is true, then sure, I will renounce any Canadian citizenship. Nothing against Canada, but I'm an American by birth and as a U.S. Senator, I believe I should be only an American." Ironically, President Obama's qualifications for office are still questioned by some who wrongly believe he was born in Kenya rather than Hawaii, even though his mother was American. Perhaps leading "Birther" mogul Donald Trump should make a ruling?
Bertrand Russell once wrote, "The trouble with the world is that the stupid are always cocksure and the intelligent are always filled with doubt. " But Senator Cruz is not stupid, and he knows it. He exudes self-confidence and swagger. Famed Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz, who taught Cruz, told The Daily Caller this past May, “Without a doubt he is among the smartest students I’ve ever had… I’ve had great students but he has to be at the top of anyone’s short list, in terms of raw brain power.”
Senator Cruz knows that if he can win over the conservative wing of his party with stirring speeches, he will be in a formidable position for the 2016 Republican presidential primaries. This strategy may indeed secure him the nomination. However, Cruz is smart enough to realize that he will have to move more to the center on health care, immigration, and social issues in order to attract the number of independent voters needed to win the White House. No doubt, he will have no problem doing that.
Conservatives, take off your blinders, and don't blink!
The ever-cocksure Cruz has set his sites on defunding Obamacare at all costs. "Under no circumstances will I vote for a continuing resolution that funds even one penny of Obamacare," Cruz said in his town hall remarks. But a continuing resolution is necessary to provide funds for the federal government to operate. If Congress fails to act in a timely manner it risks shutting down the government.
A growing number of leading Republicans are opposed to this strategy because they believe that the GOP will be blamed for the consequences. "I think it's the dumbest idea I've ever heard of," Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., said last month. "I'm for stopping Obamacare, but shutting down the government will not stop Obamacare," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told a Kentucky town hall meeting earlier this month. And Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., commissioned a Congressional Research Service report that shows that the health care law would get its funding even if the rest of the government shuts down.
Former John McCain presidential campaign aide Nicolle Wallace said on MSNBC Wednesday, “The reason we’re going to lose this debate about defunding Obamacare is because we don’t occupy the White House." She added, “We don’t have the ability to pass laws and then sign them. The best way to win this fight is to elect a Republican president.” Wallace also denounced Cruz for doing "a whole lot of fear mongering" and being "intellectually dishonest" when he was asked at a recent event about impeaching the president. She said Cruz responded, "Because we don't have the votes (in Congress)." Wallace bluntly corrected the senator, "The true answer, the intellectually honest answer: Because he’s not committed an impeachable offense."
Senator Cruz is on a crusade to become president. He has deftly deflected criticism that he may not qualify because he was born in Canada. Most constitutional scholars appear to agree he does in fact qualify because his mother is American, though it says nothing about persons with a dual citizenship. Cruz said in a statement Monday, "Now the Dallas Morning News says that I may technically have dual citizenship. Assuming that is true, then sure, I will renounce any Canadian citizenship. Nothing against Canada, but I'm an American by birth and as a U.S. Senator, I believe I should be only an American." Ironically, President Obama's qualifications for office are still questioned by some who wrongly believe he was born in Kenya rather than Hawaii, even though his mother was American. Perhaps leading "Birther" mogul Donald Trump should make a ruling?
Bertrand Russell once wrote, "The trouble with the world is that the stupid are always cocksure and the intelligent are always filled with doubt. " But Senator Cruz is not stupid, and he knows it. He exudes self-confidence and swagger. Famed Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz, who taught Cruz, told The Daily Caller this past May, “Without a doubt he is among the smartest students I’ve ever had… I’ve had great students but he has to be at the top of anyone’s short list, in terms of raw brain power.”
Senator Cruz knows that if he can win over the conservative wing of his party with stirring speeches, he will be in a formidable position for the 2016 Republican presidential primaries. This strategy may indeed secure him the nomination. However, Cruz is smart enough to realize that he will have to move more to the center on health care, immigration, and social issues in order to attract the number of independent voters needed to win the White House. No doubt, he will have no problem doing that.
Conservatives, take off your blinders, and don't blink!
Thursday, October 4, 2012
Romney's Debatable Performance
Governor Mitt Romney exceeded expectations in his debate performance at the University of Denver while President Barack Obama seemed to be trying to protect his lead.
Romney needed to have a strong performance and he did. According to a CBS News "snap poll", 46% of the 500 of uncommitted voters asked said that Romney won the debate, 22% said the president won, and 32% said it was a draw.
It was clear that Romney and his debate team planned to exploit the debate format, moderated by PBS's Jim Lehrer, with an aggressive performance. The challenger often has the advantage because the incumbent has to defend his record. But Romney got help from his opponent and the moderator because he was not challenged on his statements.
President Obama was not confrontational. He failed to raise Romney's embarrassing comments at a fundraiser that 47% are not personally responsible and depend on the federal government. The president failed to get Romney to explain what loopholes he would eliminate in his tax reform plan to pay for his 20% across the board tax cut, which would cost $5 trillion. That gave Romney the chance to say over and over his program would not cost $5 trillion.
Romney used, in Obama campaign manager David Plouffe's words, "theatrical aggression." Romney sounded confident as he gave the appearance of offering specifics without doing so. He criticized the president for "cutting" $716 billion from Medicare, the exact same amount Representative Paul Ryan, his running mate, and Republicans have voted to cut from the program. Romney did admit his would turn Medicare into a voucher program, but glossed over its impact.
Romney said he would repeal Obamacare, the president's signature health care legislation, but failed to clearly explain in detail how he would replace it. However, at one point he said his Massachusetts health care plan initiatives can apply nationally. That would seem to mean that his individual mandate, which is unpopular, would also apply. The president did not seize that opening.
For his part, President Obama did not mention his record of 30 consecutive months job growth, which has added more than 5 million private sector jobs to the U.S. economy. He also did not take credit for saving the U.S. auto industry, which saved a million U.S. jobs.
The president was consistent, persistent, but he played it safe. He was not forceful and he was not passionate. He did not make a clear case for his reelection.
The Romney campaign had leaked that their candidate would use zingers in the debate, but there were none. Instead, he attacked the incumbent's record and surprisingly even used human anecdotes. And in his strong summation he claimed he would turn the economy around and create 12 million new jobs in his first term. Never mind that economic forecasters predict that the U.S. economy is currently on track to add 12 million jobs.
Romney's performance was welcome relief to Republicans after several weeks of poor performances and embarrassing gaffs. He was convincing, and his debate appearance revved up his own base.
But did Romney convert any new voters? Will Americans support a candidate whose numbers do not add up?
Romney needed to have a strong performance and he did. According to a CBS News "snap poll", 46% of the 500 of uncommitted voters asked said that Romney won the debate, 22% said the president won, and 32% said it was a draw.
It was clear that Romney and his debate team planned to exploit the debate format, moderated by PBS's Jim Lehrer, with an aggressive performance. The challenger often has the advantage because the incumbent has to defend his record. But Romney got help from his opponent and the moderator because he was not challenged on his statements.
President Obama was not confrontational. He failed to raise Romney's embarrassing comments at a fundraiser that 47% are not personally responsible and depend on the federal government. The president failed to get Romney to explain what loopholes he would eliminate in his tax reform plan to pay for his 20% across the board tax cut, which would cost $5 trillion. That gave Romney the chance to say over and over his program would not cost $5 trillion.
Romney used, in Obama campaign manager David Plouffe's words, "theatrical aggression." Romney sounded confident as he gave the appearance of offering specifics without doing so. He criticized the president for "cutting" $716 billion from Medicare, the exact same amount Representative Paul Ryan, his running mate, and Republicans have voted to cut from the program. Romney did admit his would turn Medicare into a voucher program, but glossed over its impact.
Romney said he would repeal Obamacare, the president's signature health care legislation, but failed to clearly explain in detail how he would replace it. However, at one point he said his Massachusetts health care plan initiatives can apply nationally. That would seem to mean that his individual mandate, which is unpopular, would also apply. The president did not seize that opening.
For his part, President Obama did not mention his record of 30 consecutive months job growth, which has added more than 5 million private sector jobs to the U.S. economy. He also did not take credit for saving the U.S. auto industry, which saved a million U.S. jobs.
The president was consistent, persistent, but he played it safe. He was not forceful and he was not passionate. He did not make a clear case for his reelection.
The Romney campaign had leaked that their candidate would use zingers in the debate, but there were none. Instead, he attacked the incumbent's record and surprisingly even used human anecdotes. And in his strong summation he claimed he would turn the economy around and create 12 million new jobs in his first term. Never mind that economic forecasters predict that the U.S. economy is currently on track to add 12 million jobs.
Romney's performance was welcome relief to Republicans after several weeks of poor performances and embarrassing gaffs. He was convincing, and his debate appearance revved up his own base.
But did Romney convert any new voters? Will Americans support a candidate whose numbers do not add up?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)