Hillary Clinton Stumbles

Democrats may be getting a little anxious.  Hillary Clinton is stumbling into the starting gate.  Since she became the prohibitive favorite for her party's nomination she has made some mistakes.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has yet to explain why she used a personal email account during her entire tenure at State (2009-2013) instead of using an official government email account.  On the face of it, this makes no sense and calls in to question her judgment.   Putting aside whether she complied with regulations, a private email server does not have the same level of security against hacking that a government managed server does.  

The Russians, Chinese and Iranians very likely could have gotten access to Secretary Clinton's email traffic.  And there was plenty of traffic, especially considering the 55,000 pages of emails she turned over to the State Department are only a portion of those she wrote while in office.  

While Clinton has not talked about the controversy, her aides are fighting back by attacking the media.  Her supporters also point out that she complied with the regulations (maybe), and that former Secretary of State Colin Powell also used a private email account.  But that was five years earlier, when the State Department system wasn't as robust.  

Leading Democrats are pressing for an explanation.  Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-CA, said on NBC's Meet the Press, "From this point on...the silence is going to hurt her...She is the leading candidate, whether it be Republican or Democrat, to be the next president."  Republicans have seized the issue with gusto.   Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-SC, is chairman for the House Select Committee on Benghazi.  He told CBS's Face the Nation, his committee doesn't have all of Clinton's emails.  "It's not up to Secretary Clinton to decide what is a public record and what is not," he said, adding: "I don't want everything. I just want everything related to Libya and Benghazi."

President Barack Obama, in an interview about the 50th anniversary of the historic march in Selma, Alabama, had to address the subject in an interview with CBS News.  He said the policy of his administration was to encourage transparency.  “My emails, the Blackberry I carry around, all those records are available and archived,” Mr. Obama said. “I’m glad that Hillary’s instructed that those emails about official business need to be disclosed.”  President Obama was referring to a post on Twitter by Clinton Wednesday night in which she wrote, “I want the public to see my email. I asked State to release them. They said they will review them for release as soon as possible."   Really, that's it?  How long will it take for State to sift through 55,000 pages of email?  

Secretary Clinton's email-capade has opened up speculation as to her motive.  The conservative National Journal reasons, "its greatest relevancy is what the emails might reveal about any nexus between Clinton's work at State and donations to the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation from U.S. corporations and foreign nations."  Did the ultimate power couple leverage their positions of power for donations?  Even Saturday Night Live got into the act.  Cast member Kate McKinnon, doing an impression of Clinton, said, "Those emails are clean as a whistle. This is not how Hillary Clinton goes down." 


Senator Chuck Schumer found himself defending Secretary Clinton on CBS's Face the Nation.  "The bottom line is she's a national figure, a potential presidential candidate. People are going to shoot at her," he said calling it a “slight bump in the road six months from now.”  

Hillary Clinton is rumored to be putting her campaign team together, and she may announce her intention to run for president sooner rather than later.  However, her handling of the controversy over her use of private emails while at the State Department has exposed one of her great weaknesses: transparency.  This may well be her Achilles heel.

The Politics of Benghazi

Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.  It has become the battle cry of congressional Republicans as they continue to politicize a human tragedy in order to energize their base and tarnish the reputation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Republicans accuse the administration of a cover-up and negligence for failing to provide adequate security at the diplomatic compound in Benghazi.  Democrats accuse Republicans of playing politics with Benghazi and for irresponsibly cutting the budget for State Department security.

On September 11, 2012, four Americans were killed, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, in an attack by armed militants on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, and later a nearby CIA annex.   The incident took place on the eleventh anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States, and two months before the 2012 Presidential Election.  President Obama had frequently touted his anti-terrorism record during the campaign.

On September 12, President Obama called the attacks an outrageous act, "No acts of terror will shake the resolve of this great nation…Today we mourn four Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America."  He continued, "We shall not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act.  And make no mistake, justice will be done."   

The following Sunday, Susan Rice, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, appeared on five network public affairs programs.  Ambassador Rice said that the administration had no evidence that the attack was preplanned but it was investigating.  "Based on the best information we have to date…what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what transpired some hours earlier in Cairo, where…there was a violent protest outside of our embassy sparked by a hateful video…(In Benghazi) We believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that effort with heavy weapons."  

Rice's explanation immediately came under fire from leading Republicans, who said the attack was preplanned by extremists with links to al Qaeda.  They accused Rice of misleading the American public in order to protect the president's image of being strong on terror.   They also criticized the administration's response during the attack, and the lack of security that had been in place prior to the assault.  

Following the attack, the administration increased security at its diplomatic missions, announced that the FBI would investigate, and increased surveillance to hunt for the attackers.  The State Department's Accountability Review Board released findings in December 2012.  It found, "Systematic failures and leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels within two bureaus of the State Department…resulted in a special mission security posture that was inadequate for Benghazi and grossly inadequate to deal with the attack that took pace."  

While she quickly implemented corrective measures, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has come under continuous criticism for Benghazi.  In January 2013, she told a congressional hearing, "I take responsibility.  Nobody is more committed to getting this right.  I am determined to leave the State Department and our country safer, stronger and more secure."  

In the 18 months following Benghazi, Politico reports congress held 13 hearings and 50 briefings, and 25,000 pages of documents have been turned over to congressional investigators.  The New York Times conducted an exhaustive investigation and reported, "The attack does not appear to have been meticulously planned, but neither was it spontaneous or without warning signs."  As to the hateful video, entitled Innocence of Muslims, the Times reported that the attack was "fueled in part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam." 

Meanwhile, last month the conservative group Judicial Watch released 100 pages of documents it had obtained from its Freedom of Information Act request.  They included an email from White House advisor Ben Rhodes that spelled out talking points to be used at the time by administration spokespersons.  He wrote in part, "To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader policy failure."  While every administration has issued talking points, especially during a crisis, Republicans saw this as a smoking gun.  

As a result, House Speaker John Boehner has said he will create a special select committee to investigate the attacks.  Now some Democrats are talking about boycotting the committee, but House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi has said she is open to the suggestion.  "If this review is to be fair, it must truly be bipartisan," meaning an equal amount of Democrats and Republicans, she said in a written statement.    

As Republicans hope to win control of both houses of congress in the midterm elections this November, they see Benghazi as an issue that will mobilize their voters to the polls.  They have intensified their attacks on the administration to a fever pitch in part to damage Secretary Clinton, who is likely run for president in 2016.  

Benghazi has turned into an investigation about talking points.  It has become a political rallying cry for Republicans, who see it as the gift that will keep on giving to 2016, while overlooking similar such incidents under Republican presidents.

Lost in their vitriol is the memory of four Americans who gave their lives in service of their country. Benghazi was a terrible tragedy.   But its brave victims deserve to be treated with more respect.